Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vit Kopriva vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kopriva vs Almeida analysis and find out who is favored!
Vit Kopriva vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kopriva 1 - 0 Almeida
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kopriva has won 44.15% of points on his second serve, while Almeida has won 47.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kopriva, in recent form, has won 53.32% of his opponent's second serve points, while Almeida has won 50.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.6% and 37.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kopriva has saved 58.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Almeida has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kopriva has won 58.46% of matches played (W/L 38/ 27), with Almeida winning 45.83% (W/L 22/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kopriva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 246/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Almeida has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 154/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kopriva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.36% of matches (W/L 27/ 17), where as Almeida has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 20/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kopriva winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kopriva winning 2 and Almeida winning 0. The last match between Kopriva and Almeida was at the Prostejov Challenger, 02-06-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Vit Kopriva getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kopriva and Almeida have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kopriva winning 0 times and Almeida 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kopriva winning 0, and Almeida 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kopriva has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.05 while Almeida has played against players with an average rank of 280.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kopriva has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Almeida has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kopriva has converted 47.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Almeida has converted 48.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
127
Rank
111
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
330
Rank
190
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
59% (343-240)
Career Total W/L
59% (176-122)
52% (15-14)
YTD W/L
56% (10-8)
$372,445
Career Prize Money
$57,890
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Vit Kopriva | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:26 | 1:30:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (28/50) | 62% (41/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (23/28) | 59% (24/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 36% (9/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (33/66) | 28% (14/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vit Kopriva | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (15/14) | 56% (10/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (37/33) | 59% (24/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (335/326) | 53% (207/185) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 56% (10/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 50 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 136 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:56 | 2:8:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 244.34 | 276.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1312/2073) | 62% (827/1337) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (903/1312) | 67% (556/827) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (336/761) | 48% (244/510) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (92/192) | 48% (59/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (825/2043) | 42% (539/1274) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 57% (8/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 59% (10/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 20% (5/1) |
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Vit Kopriva
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Mate Valkusz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Coria
73%
(
87 of
119)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
54 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Vit Kopriva
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Martin Landaluce
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
44
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Liam Draxl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
41%
(
28 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kopriva Vs Almeida Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
